Covey versus Allen: Let battle commence!

By on September 26th, 2008

Just who has the “best” personal productivity system, Covey or Allen?

In the September 1, 2008 issues of Fortune, the David Allen method was chosen as the most practical approach over Covey and another well known productivity coach. Here’s what I think of the article?

Book cover via Amazon

Get a copy of this article by clicking HERE

I think the article is a very accurate summary of at least two of the methods, Stephen Covey and David Allen’s GTD. I am not familiar with Jim Loehr’s method so I can’t comment. From what I read, I agree with the author’s assessment.

My personal bottom line is that David Allen’s system was the most useful, Loehr’s the most energizing, and Covey’s the most profound. Whether I’ll be able to keep up all these new habits remains to be seen. All I know is that right now my office is now perfectly organized I’m clear about my life’s purpose.

I agree with Lieven that it doesn’t have to be either/or. However, most people couldn’t afford to run all three programs in parallel (based on both time and money costs.) A primary difference, in my opinion, is that David Allen’s is the most holistic and frees up my energy to enjoy life in the present, not at some “vision” point in the future.

What I really like about the GTD method is that it focuses on the now and frees up your mind to allow it to work on more meaningful work/projects/tasks - this in turn will solve your big life purpose/goals. I have been working with GTD for several years and have outstanding results - even from the very beginning with implementing the A-Z file system along with saying “what is the next action here” - you will see immediate results.

There are pieces of both the Covey and the Loehr approach built into the GTD method. Best of all, you can implement GTD quickly (and inexpensively - just buy the books and support materials). The weekly review is key to putting it all together.

And finally, another important aspect, the GTD trusted system can be implemented with just plain paper and/or electronic system (or a hybrid) - there are plenty of interesting tools to support paper, electronic and hybrid implementations.

In summary: I’m grateful that the Fortune writer chose GTD over Covey and the other coach. Although I thought the deeper aspects of GTD were not included in the article, I still would have liked to see more about the necessity to close “open loops” and the power of “mind like water.”

What do you think? Leave a comment below:

Enjoy this post? Get more like it by subscribing

Bookmark and Share

Categories: Getting Things Done, Goals & Goal Setting
Tags: David Allen, Getting Things Done, Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity, Goal, GTD, Productivity, Stephen Covey

Related Posts:

Viewing 5 Comments

John B. Kendrick 1 month ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

I used and taught Covey and Daytimer for many years before reading David Allen's GTD book and switching to GTD. And then I found an application that allows me to view my entire GTD at work on my Win machine, at home on my Macs and even on my cell phone. And another app lets me call in tasks to my GTD without any writing or typing, great for those thoughts that hit me while driving. I've written about my experiences with GTD in a blog post at http://johnkendrick.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/mo... John

reply edit reblog flag record video comment

http://johnkendrick.wordpress.com

DavidPalmer 1 month ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

I agree GTD is a good system but unlike Covey's philosophy (unless I am reading it wrong) it is very focussed on the individual aplying it, whereas the Covey system is also focussed on the interpersonal relationships within which tasks and time have to be managed. No reason why one cannot apply both philosophies.

reply edit reblog flag record video comment

qamanager 1 month ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

I agree. GTD seems to concentrate more on the day-to-day tasks and the higher level overview it suggests seems somehow tagged onto the philosophy. This is a great article exploring this point further:

http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/02/the-es...

reply edit reblog flag record video comment

1 /people/qamanager/ /people/qamanager/following/ http://rob-thompson.com 726359782 in/robertthompson qa.manager rumblepants qa.manager

DavidPalmer 1 month ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

Qamanager - thanks for supporting me and taking me to that page. It says it better than I could! I certainly changed my management of office and paper to a GTD-type methodology and I have the tidiest trays, desk and in-box in the office. I am surrounded by people with piles of paper, desks all akimbo with post-its galore, all moaning about being busy while I play Solitaire, carry out my core tasks AND in-house personal development training delivery (and other sidelines requiring my attention). But apparently, my time management ability is not of interest to them. Whose the fool, here?

reply edit reblog flag record video comment

qamanager 1 month ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

hi David: Whose the fool, here? Erm .... not you I think?

reply edit reblog flag record video comment

1 /people/qamanager/ /people/qamanager/following/ http://rob-thompson.com 726359782 in/robertthompson qa.manager rumblepants qa.manager