Why should smokers pay for fatties?
Follow me on Twitter
Americans get really weird when we talk about obesity. They’re terrified of hurting the feelings of fat people and treat their condition as a mystery, a phenomenon that modern science may someday unravel. If you can’t drink four litres of cola a day and stay skinny, it must mean you have a slow metabolism or something – anything rather than admit that junk food creates porkers. Take California. Research shows that obesity costs the state almost $7.7bn a year. With this in mind, the state legislature last week proposed a new tax on… tobacco.
Just 13% of adults smoke in California, yet lawmakers want to penalise this harassed minority to help pay for the ballooning costs of obesity. But why not tax fast food instead? American shops are awash with sugary and fried snacks that contain almost no nutritional value. It’s not food, it’s calorific entertainment – so charging extra for it is reasonable. It wouldn’t bankrupt junk-food makers, and junk-food eaters might not even notice. But it finally would force junk food to contribute to healthcare instead of just weighing on the system.
Related articles
- Do not Do Xenadrine – Lose Weight Safely
- Reasons for Childhood Obesity
- Escape From Obesity
- The Causes of Obesity
- White workingclass pupils eat most junk food claims children’s minister
- Half of adults ‘will be obese by 2050′
- Well: Money Is Tight, and Junk Food Beckons
- Popular American Foods and Recipes
- Different Foods to Avoid Inorder Lower Cholesterol
- Food labels simplified in anti-obesity fight
Similar Posts:
- Energy: The Key to Success
- Obesity – a weighty issue
- 17 Arse-kicking Strategies to Stick to Your Diet and Get Fit
- Are fatties lepers who cause global warming?
- Happiness comes in a can
Originally posted 2008-11-18 00:02:05.
7 Comments
robert edward cenek on January 3rd, 2008
Right on the money…
I wrote a similar note on the obesity epidemic within the US. This is the real public health calamity, not smoking.
robert edward cenek, RODP
http://www.cenekreport.com
robert edward cenek on January 3rd, 2008
Right on the money…
I wrote a similar note on the obesity epidemic within the US. This is the real public health calamity, not smoking.
robert edward cenek, RODP
http://www.cenekreport.com
Best posts on rob-thompson.com from Nov 2008 | rob-thompson.com on November 24th, 2008
[...] Why should smokers pay for fatties? Posted on Tuesday, November 18th, 2008 in Health & Fitness – Comments: (4) Americans get really weird when we talk about obesity. They’re terrified of hurting the feelings of fat people and treat their condition as a mystery, a phenomenon that modern science may someday unravel. If you can’t drink four litres of cola a day and stay skinny, it must mean you have a slow metabolism or something – anything rather than admit that junk food creates porkers. [...]
office space chicago on November 17th, 2009
Very informative post, thanks for sharing.
bilgi nedir on December 21st, 2009
I found this informative and interesting blog so i think so its very useful and knowledge able.I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing abilities has inspired me.
Leave a Comment
Additional comments powered by BackType



![Why should smokers pay for fatties? Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=3c7793db-4420-4dd1-946e-1d12baaeb089)









shaun sayers on January 3rd, 2008
I agree
http://blog.capablepeople.co.uk/blog/_archives/2008/1/2/3442821.html